rs201547060

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006302.3(MOGS):c.1944G>A(p.Glu648Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00019 in 1,614,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MOGS
NM_006302.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0830

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MOGS (HGNC:24862): (mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase) This gene encodes the first enzyme in the N-linked oligosaccharide processing pathway. The enzyme cleaves the distal alpha-1,2-linked glucose residue from the Glc(3)-Man(9)-GlcNAc(2) oligosaccharide precursor. This protein is located in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Defects in this gene are a cause of type IIb congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDGIIb). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

MOGS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

MOGS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 2-74461845-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-74461845-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 514798.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.083 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00103 (157/152342) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00363 (151/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00316. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 80 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MOGS	NM_006302.3 link	c.1944G>A	p.Glu648Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 4	ENST00000448666.7	NP_006293.2	Q13724-1A0A384MDR6
MOGS	NM_001146158.2 link	c.1626G>A	p.Glu542Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 5		NP_001139630.1	Q13724-2Q58F09

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MOGS	ENST00000448666.7 link	c.1944G>A	p.Glu648Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1	NM_006302.3	ENSP00000410992.3		Q13724-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00102

AC:

156

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000273

AC:

AN:

249272

AF XY:

0.000273

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00408

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000103

AC:

150

AN:

1461808

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000935

AC XY:

AN XY:

727206

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00370

AC:

124

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53348

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000270

AC:

AN:

1112002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000199

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00103

AC:

157

AN:

152342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00107

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00363

AC:

151

AN:

41580

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000392

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.513

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000575

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00115

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

MOGS-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation

Benign:1

Dec 25, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

4.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.74

PhyloP100

0.083

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over