Menu
GeneBe

rs201555289

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_015404.4(WHRN):c.2354C>T(p.Thr785Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000209 in 1,611,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T785T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

WHRN
NM_015404.4 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
WHRN (HGNC:16361): (whirlin) This gene is thought to function in the organization and stabilization of sterocilia elongation and actin cystoskeletal assembly, based on studies of the related mouse gene. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness and Usher Syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.05802259).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00021 (306/1459294) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000788 (68/86256). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000638. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 170 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 57. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WHRNNM_015404.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2354C>T p.Thr785Ile missense_variant 10/12 ENST00000362057.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WHRNENST00000362057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2354C>T p.Thr785Ile missense_variant 10/121 NM_015404.4 P1Q9P202-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000204
AC:
31
AN:
152200
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000300
AC:
75
AN:
249902
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000385
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
135158
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000596
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000210
AC:
306
AN:
1459294
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
57
AF XY:
0.000234
AC XY:
170
AN XY:
725982
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000536
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000788
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000156
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000204
AC:
31
AN:
152318
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000312
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000144
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000214
AC:
26
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 13, 2021In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 24, 2022This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 785 of the WHRN protein (p.Thr785Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs201555289, gnomAD 0.08%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with WHRN-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 45673). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 20, 2012Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Thr785Ile varia nt in DFNB31 has not been reported in the literature nor previously identified b y our laboratory. Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, con servation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the Thr785Ile variant ma y not impact the protein. In addition, this variant has been identified in 0.03% (3/8600) of European American chromosomes and 0.02% (1/4406) of African America n chromosomes in a broad population by the NHLBI Exome sequencing project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs201555289). In summary, computational ana lyses predictions, lack of conservation at this position, and the presence of th is variant in the general population support a more likely benign role, however additional data is needed to determine its clinical significance with certainty. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 31 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 2D Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
-0.0065
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.090
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.71
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.012
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.058
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.039
Sift
Benign
0.057
T;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.38, 0.28
.;B;B
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.27
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
4.1
Varity_R
0.049
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201555289; hg19: chr9-117166240; API