rs201581661
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_005629.4(SLC6A8):c.777+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000726 in 1,197,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 274 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005629.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC6A8 | NM_005629.4 | c.777+4C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000253122.10 | NP_005620.1 | |||
SLC6A8 | NM_001142805.2 | c.777+4C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001136277.1 | ||||
SLC6A8 | NM_001142806.1 | c.432+4C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001136278.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC6A8 | ENST00000253122.10 | c.777+4C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_005629.4 | ENSP00000253122.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000569 AC: 64AN: 112396Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.000463 AC XY: 16AN XY: 34592
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000538 AC: 88AN: 163556Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000545 AC XY: 28AN XY: 51378
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000742 AC: 805AN: 1085346Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000732 AC XY: 258AN XY: 352486
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000569 AC: 64AN: 112396Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.000463 AC XY: 16AN XY: 34592
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 31, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 28, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | SLC6A8: BP4, BS2 - |
Creatine transporter deficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 15, 2024 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
SLC6A8-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 01, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at