rs201595274

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.3839C>T(p.Ser1280Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000705 in 1,602,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000061 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.653

Variant links:

Genes affected

PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

PTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0036492944).

BP6

Variant 9-95447417-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95447417-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 415469.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-95447417-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000158 (24/152306) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00387 (20/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00256. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 24 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PTCH1	NM_000264.5 link	c.3839C>T	p.Ser1280Leu	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	ENST00000331920.11	NP_000255.2	Q13635-1
PTCH1	NM_001083603.3 link	c.3836C>T	p.Ser1279Leu	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	ENST00000437951.6	NP_001077072.1	Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PTCH1	ENST00000331920.11 link	c.3839C>T	p.Ser1280Leu	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5	NM_000264.5	ENSP00000332353.6		Q13635-1
PTCH1	ENST00000437951.6 link	c.3836C>T	p.Ser1279Leu	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5	NM_001083603.3	ENSP00000389744.2		Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00386

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

239534

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000145

AC XY:

AN XY:

130612

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00291

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000675

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000916

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000614

AC:

AN:

1450536

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000527

AC XY:

AN XY:

720830

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000303

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00167

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000351

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000835

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000175

AC XY:

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00387

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000567

ExAC

AF:

0.000215

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Aug 22, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The PTCH1 c.3839C>T (p.Ser1280Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 25/113926 control chromosomes from ExAC at a frequency of 0.0002194, which is approximately 13 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PTCH1 variant (0.0000171), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories in ClinVar have classified this variant as likely benign. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in affected individuals in literature, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PTCH1: BS1, BS2 -

Gorlin syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Oct 11, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jan 01, 2022

Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Basal cell nevus syndrome 1

Benign:1

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Holoprosencephaly 7

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.085

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.43

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

T;.;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.12

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;.;T;T;.;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.046

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0036

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.73

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.5

L;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.1

N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.16

Sift

Benign

0.44

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.28

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;.;.;B;B;.;B

Vest4

0.12

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.073

ClinPred

0.0074

GERP RS

-0.33

Varity_R

0.055

gMVP

0.20

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over