rs201618718
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.3622C>A(p.Arg1208Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,459,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1208C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO15A | ENST00000647165.2 | c.3622C>A | p.Arg1208Ser | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 66 | NM_016239.4 | ENSP00000495481.1 | |||
MYO15A | ENST00000651088.1 | c.163C>A | p.Arg55Ser | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000498988.1 | ||||
MYO15A | ENST00000583079.1 | n.5328C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 1 | 6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726198 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at