rs201638602

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006941.4(SOX10):c.428+10C>G variant causes a intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000291 in 1,603,374 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

SOX10
NM_006941.4 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.91

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SOX10 (HGNC:11190): (SRY-box transcription factor 10) This gene encodes a member of the SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) family of transcription factors involved in the regulation of embryonic development and in the determination of the cell fate. The encoded protein may act as a transcriptional activator after forming a protein complex with other proteins. This protein acts as a nucleocytoplasmic shuttle protein and is important for neural crest and peripheral nervous system development. Mutations in this gene are associated with Waardenburg-Shah and Waardenburg-Hirschsprung disease. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SOX10 links:

POLR2F (HGNC:9193): (RNA polymerase II, I and III subunit F) This gene encodes the sixth largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, the polymerase responsible for synthesizing messenger RNA in eukaryotes. In yeast, this polymerase subunit, in combination with at least two other subunits, forms a structure that stabilizes the transcribing polymerase on the DNA template. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]

POLR2F links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BP6

Variant 22-37983347-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-37983347-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 227080.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000368 (56/152290) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0107 (55/5164). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0084. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 32 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 56 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
SOX10	NM_006941.4 link	c.428+10C>G	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 3	ENST00000396884.8	NP_008872.1
POLR2F	NM_001301130.2 link	c.294-2807G>C	intron_variant	Intron 4 of 5		NP_001288059.1
POLR2F	NM_001363825.1 link	c.*38+11037G>C	intron_variant	Intron 5 of 5		NP_001350754.1
POLR2F	NM_001301131.2 link	c.293+16177G>C	intron_variant	Intron 4 of 4		NP_001288060.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SOX10	ENST00000396884.8 link	c.428+10C>G		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 3	1	NM_006941.4	ENSP00000380093.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000375

AC:

AN:

152174

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0108

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000972

AC:

225

AN:

231482

AF XY:

0.000839

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000293

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000524

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000283

AC:

411

AN:

1451084

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000291

AC XY:

210

AN XY:

721228

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33260

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

43490

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25902

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00919

AC:

361

AN:

39264

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000294

AC:

AN:

84964

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4414

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000541

AC:

AN:

1108508

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000317

AC:

AN:

59862

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

124

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000430

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0107

AC:

AN:

5164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.503

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000171

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000521

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 27, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dec 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Nov 24, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

428+10C>G in intron 2 of SOX10: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seque nce. It has been identified in 3.0% (6/200) of Han Chinese chromosomes from a br oad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects /SNP; dbSNP rs201638602). -

PCWH syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Waardenburg syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

3.9

PromoterAI

-0.016

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over