rs201651890
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_147127.5(EVC2):c.3837G>C(p.Lys1279Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K1279E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_147127.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- acrofacial dysostosis, Weyers typeInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- Ellis-van Creveld syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251438 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74270 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at