rs201709261
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_005883.3(APC2):c.971C>T(p.Thr324Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00491 in 1,529,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005883.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC2 | NM_005883.3 | c.971C>T | p.Thr324Ile | missense_variant | 9/15 | ENST00000590469.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC2 | ENST00000590469.6 | c.971C>T | p.Thr324Ile | missense_variant | 9/15 | 1 | NM_005883.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00376 AC: 572AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00492 AC: 599AN: 121846Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00513 AC XY: 346AN XY: 67502
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00504 AC: 6937AN: 1377584Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00512 AC XY: 3478AN XY: 679916
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00376 AC: 572AN: 152306Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00399 AC XY: 297AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2023 | APC2: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 26, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at