rs201727684

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.1365T>C(p.Leu455Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000931 in 1,613,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00098 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NRXN1
NM_001330078.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.76

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NRXN1 (HGNC:8008): (neurexin 1) This gene encodes a single-pass type I membrane protein that belongs to the neurexin family. Neurexins are cell-surface receptors that bind neuroligins to form Ca(2+)-dependent neurexin/neuroligin complexes at synapses in the central nervous system. This complex is required for efficient neurotransmission and is involved in the formation of synaptic contacts. Three members of this gene family have been studied in detail and are estimated to generate over 3,000 variants through the use of two alternative promoters (alpha and beta) and extensive alternative splicing in each family member. Recently, a third promoter (gamma) was identified for this gene in the 3' region. Mutations in this gene are associated with Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome-2 and may contribute to susceptibility to schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

NRXN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
chromosome 2p16.3 deletion syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autism
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: G2P
schizophrenia
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

NRXN1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 2-50552981-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-50552981-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 138549.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.76 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000486 (74/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000808 (55/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000638. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 34 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NRXN1	NM_001330078.2 link	c.1365T>C	p.Leu455Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 23	ENST00000401669.7	NP_001317007.1	E7ERL8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NRXN1	ENST00000401669.7 link	c.1365T>C	p.Leu455Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 23	5	NM_001330078.2	ENSP00000385017.2		E7ERL8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000486

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00374

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000808

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000543

AC:

135

AN:

248486

AF XY:

0.000549

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000464

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00389

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000648

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000831

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000978

AC:

1428

AN:

1460742

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000911

AC XY:

662

AN XY:

726560

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000897

AC:

AN:

33428

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

44674

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00379

AC:

AN:

26106

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86214

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000940

AC:

AN:

53198

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00114

AC:

1266

AN:

1111324

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000630

AC:

AN:

60344

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

141

211

282

352

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

112

168

224

280

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000486

AC:

AN:

152314

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000456

AC XY:

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41570

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00374

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000941

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000808

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000960

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000574

EpiCase

AF:

0.000927

EpiControl

AF:

0.000890

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jul 12, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

NRXN1: BP4, BP7 -

Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 14, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 03, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 22, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

NRXN1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 04, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

6.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.81

PhyloP100

1.8

PromoterAI

0.0033

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over