rs201730485
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_024867.4(SPEF2):c.2390A>G(p.Asp797Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000782 in 1,613,526 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024867.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- spermatogenic failure 43Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- non-syndromic male infertility due to sperm motility disorderInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEF2 | NM_024867.4 | c.2390A>G | p.Asp797Gly | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 37 | ENST00000356031.8 | NP_079143.3 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000453 AC: 69AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000442 AC: 110AN: 248654 AF XY: 0.000526 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000816 AC: 1192AN: 1461152Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000810 AC XY: 589AN XY: 726810 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000453 AC: 69AN: 152374Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74524 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Candidate PCD gene, but no second suspicious variant and no information on this variant -
not provided Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at