rs201738304

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.705+11C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00153 in 1,613,476 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.25

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • May-Hegglin anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 22-36322418-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36322418-G-A is described in CliVar as Benign/Likely_benign. Clinvar id is 164462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00105 (160/152384) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00193 (131/68036). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00166. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 71 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 160 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkc.705+11C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 40 ENST00000216181.11 NP_002464.1 P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkc.705+11C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 40 1 NM_002473.6 ENSP00000216181.6 P35579-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00105
AC:
160
AN:
152266
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000555
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00103
AC:
258
AN:
250988
AF XY:
0.00105
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000994
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000218
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
2313
AN:
1461092
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00153
AC XY:
1115
AN XY:
726906
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000766
AC:
2
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000243
AC:
21
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000489
AC:
26
AN:
53138
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00197
AC:
2192
AN:
1111564
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000961
AC:
58
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
113
227
340
454
567
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
82
164
246
328
410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
160
AN:
152384
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000953
AC XY:
71
AN XY:
74522
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000553
AC:
23
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10630
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
131
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
17
26
34
43
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00111
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00104

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Jan 22, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Feb 26, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.705+11C>T in intron 06 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seq uence and has been identified in 0.2% (114/65762) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs368 753427). -

MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
1.3
DANN
Benign
0.68
PhyloP100
-1.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201738304; hg19: chr22-36718463; API