rs201743423
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_002382.5(MAX):c.25G>T(p.Val9Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000496 in 1,613,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MAX
NM_002382.5 missense
NM_002382.5 missense
Scores
5
7
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.29
Genes affected
MAX (HGNC:6913): (MYC associated factor X) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLHZ) family of transcription factors. It is able to form homodimers and heterodimers with other family members, which include Mad, Mxi1 and Myc. Myc is an oncoprotein implicated in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. The homodimers and heterodimers compete for a common DNA target site (the E box) and rearrangement among these dimer forms provides a complex system of transcriptional regulation. Mutations of this gene have been reported to be associated with hereditary pheochromocytoma. A pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 7. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
PM1
?
In a chain Protein max (size 158) in uniprot entity MAX_HUMAN there are 14 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (88%) in NM_002382.5
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23076162).
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152210) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0000882 (6/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000376. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 10 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAX | NM_002382.5 | c.25G>T | p.Val9Leu | missense_variant | 1/5 | ENST00000358664.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAX | ENST00000358664.9 | c.25G>T | p.Val9Leu | missense_variant | 1/5 | 1 | NM_002382.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000890 AC: 22AN: 247102Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000820 AC XY: 11AN XY: 134146
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
247102
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
134146
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000479 AC: 70AN: 1461568Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000578 AC XY: 42AN XY: 727098
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
70
AN:
1461568
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
727098
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74358
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74358
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
10
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Pheochromocytoma Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 03, 2023 | Observed in an individual with bilateral pheochromocytoma, in another individual with both a paraganglioma and a pheochromocytoma in which loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was not detected and in a third individual with thyroid and breast cancer who also carried a deleterious MSH6 variant (Burnichon et al., 2012; Menara et al., 2015; Bakos et al., 2021); Published functional studies demonstrate inability to fully repress MYC activity compared to wildtype (Comino-Mendex et al., 2015); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22452945, 25405498, 34426522, 34130653, 26070438) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 13, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 08, 2023 | The p.V9L variant (also known as c.25G>T), located in coding exon 1 of the MAX gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 25. The valine at codon 9 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in a 13 year old male with a pheochromocytoma and a thoracoabdominal paraganglioma from a cohort of 1694 patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (Burnichon N et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012 May; 18(10):2828-37; Comino-Méndez I et al. J. Mol. Med. 2015 Nov; 93(11):1247-55). This alteration was also detected in a cohort of patients with co-occurring breast and thyroid cancer (Bakos B et al. BMC Cancer, 2021 Jun;21:706). Additionally, in a luciferase reporter assay, this alteration was found to have a minor impact on MYC’s E-box transcriptional activation (Comino-Méndez I et al. J. Mol. Med. 2015 Nov; 93(11):1247-55). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 07, 2024 | This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 9 of the MAX protein (p.Val9Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs201743423, gnomAD 0.05%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with adrenal pheochromocytoma and thoracoabdominal paraganglioma (PMID: 22452945). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 313819). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (Invitae) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MAX function with a negative predictive value of 95%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects MAX function (PMID: 26070438). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
Cadd
Uncertain
Dann
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;.;T;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M;.;M;M;.;M;.;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;N
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;.;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Benign
T;T;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0010, 0.018, 0.99, 0.0
.;B;B;D;.;B;.;B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);Gain of catalytic residue at I7 (P = 0.0031);
MVP
MPC
0.98
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at