rs201815805

chr12-109794319-G-Achr12-109794319-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):c.1491+10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000419 in 1,610,956 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00034 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: TRPV4 NM_021625.5 intron
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:12
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -2.25

Genes affected

TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BP6: Variant 12-109794319-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109794319-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 282949.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=6, Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000342 (52/152238) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000662 (45/67988). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000508. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 23 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 52 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TRPV4	NM_021625.5	c.1491+10C>T		intron_variant		ENST00000261740.7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TRPV4	ENST00000261740.7	c.1491+10C>T		intron_variant		1	NM_021625.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000342 AC: 52 AN: 152120 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000262

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000662

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000368 AC: 91 AN: 247542 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000402 AC XY: 54 AN XY: 134326

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000218

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0000529

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000664

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000821

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000427 AC: 623 AN: 1458718 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000467 AC XY: 339 AN XY: 725746

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000101

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000397

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000529

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000315

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000342 AC: 52 AN: 152238 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23 AN XY: 74438

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000261

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000662

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.000395 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000298

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	May 27, 2016	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Aug 23, 2023	- -

not specified Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Feb 20, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 07, 2018	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 22, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

-

- -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

TRPV4-related condition Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Sep 06, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
Cadd	Benign	0.0030
Dann	Benign	0.42

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201815805; hg19: chr12-110232124;