rs201857437

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_022455.5(NSD1):​c.4892A>G​(p.Lys1631Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000712 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00036 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NSD1
NM_022455.5 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.67

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NSD1 (HGNC:14234): (nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1) This gene encodes a protein containing a SET domain, 2 LXXLL motifs, 3 nuclear translocation signals (NLSs), 4 plant homeodomain (PHD) finger regions, and a proline-rich region. The encoded protein enhances androgen receptor (AR) transactivation, and this enhancement can be increased further in the presence of other androgen receptor associated coregulators. This protein may act as a nucleus-localized, basic transcriptional factor and also as a bifunctional transcriptional regulator. Mutations of this gene have been associated with Sotos syndrome and Weaver syndrome. One version of childhood acute myeloid leukemia is the result of a cryptic translocation with the breakpoints occurring within nuclear receptor-binding Su-var, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax domain protein 1 on chromosome 5 and nucleoporin, 98-kd on chromosome 11. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2018]
NSD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome due to NSD1 mutation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Sotos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
  • Sotos syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 7 uncertain in NM_022455.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.021259487).
BP6
Variant 5-177257077-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177257077-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 96061.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000361 (55/152262) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00125 (52/41542). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00098. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 23 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 55 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NSD1NM_022455.5 linkc.4892A>G p.Lys1631Arg missense_variant Exon 13 of 23 ENST00000439151.7 NP_071900.2 Q96L73-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NSD1ENST00000439151.7 linkc.4892A>G p.Lys1631Arg missense_variant Exon 13 of 23 1 NM_022455.5 ENSP00000395929.2 Q96L73-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000362
AC:
55
AN:
152144
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000875
AC:
22
AN:
251466
AF XY:
0.0000368
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000410
AC:
60
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000426
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00128
AC:
43
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000134
AC:
6
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000540
AC:
6
AN:
1112000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000662
AC:
4
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
13
17
21
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000361
AC:
55
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000309
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00125
AC:
52
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.519
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000183
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000348
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00113
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000140
AC:
17
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Sotos syndrome Pathogenic:1Benign:2
Aug 22, 2023
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:flagged submission
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Oct 10, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 18, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Feb 08, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

NSD1-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 03, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.080
.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
0.059
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.20
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.88
D;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.054
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.021
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.34
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.055
.;N;.
PhyloP100
3.7
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.69
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.61
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.52
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.92
P;B;P
Vest4
0.23
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.67
ClinPred
0.081
T
GERP RS
5.3
Varity_R
0.046
gMVP
0.62
Mutation Taster
=90/10
disease causing (ClinVar)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201857437; hg19: chr5-176684078; API