rs201877419

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_012210.4(TRIM32):c.292C>A(p.Leu98Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000589 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TRIM32
NM_012210.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.96

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRIM32 (HGNC:16380): (tripartite motif containing 32) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family. The TRIM motif includes three zinc-binding domains, a RING, a B-box type 1 and a B-box type 2, and a coiled-coil region. The protein localizes to cytoplasmic bodies. The protein has also been localized to the nucleus, where it interacts with the activation domain of the HIV-1 Tat protein. The Tat protein activates transcription of HIV-1 genes. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TRIM32 links:

ASTN2 (HGNC:17021): (astrotactin 2) This gene encodes a protein that is expressed in the brain and may function in neuronal migration, based on functional studies of the related astrotactin 1 gene in human and mouse. A deletion at this locus has been associated with schizophrenia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different proteins have been found for this locus. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

ASTN2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.026567996).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000387 (59/152318) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00372 (57/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00295. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 38 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRIM32	NM_012210.4 link	c.292C>A	p.Leu98Ile	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000450136.2	NP_036342.2	Q13049A0A024R843
ASTN2	NM_001365068.1 link	c.2806+27737G>T		intron_variant	Intron 16 of 22	ENST00000313400.9	NP_001351997.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRIM32	ENST00000450136.2 link	c.292C>A	p.Leu98Ile	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_012210.4	ENSP00000408292.1		Q13049
ASTN2	ENST00000313400.9 link	c.2806+27737G>T		intron_variant	Intron 16 of 22	5	NM_001365068.1	ENSP00000314038.4		O75129-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000388

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00373

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

251172

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000737

AC XY:

AN XY:

135774

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000723

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000246

AC:

AN:

1461720

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000220

AC XY:

AN XY:

727168

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000783

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000387

AC:

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000510

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00372

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.000397

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3

May 19, 2022

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 11, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 20, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously reported as a pathogenic or benign germline variant to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27485054) -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 11

Uncertain:1

Feb 16, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Sarcotubular myopathy

Uncertain:1

Feb 16, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Sarcotubular myopathy;C1859569:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 11

Uncertain:1

Apr 01, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Uncertain:1

Dec 22, 2023

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 98 of the TRIM32 protein (p.Leu98Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs201877419, gnomAD 0.07%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TRIM32-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 289342). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.18

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.30

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.95

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.090

T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

0.17

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.27

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

T;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.027

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

L;L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.63

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.35

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.068

Sift

Uncertain

0.0070

D;D;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.19

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.82

P;P;.

Vest4

0.15

MVP

0.75

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.069

GERP RS

4.3

Varity_R

0.099

gMVP

0.20

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over