rs201880122
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP2BP6BS1
The NM_000090.4(COL3A1):c.3413C>T(p.Pro1138Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000136 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
COL3A1
NM_000090.4 missense
NM_000090.4 missense
Scores
3
11
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.750
Genes affected
COL3A1 (HGNC:2201): (collagen type III alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type III collagen, a fibrillar collagen that is found in extensible connective tissues such as skin, lung, uterus, intestine and the vascular system, frequently in association with type I collagen. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, and with aortic and arterial aneurysms. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), COL3A1. . Gene score misZ 4.0879 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.5995 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type, autosomal dominant Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vascular type, polymicrogyria with or without vascular-type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
BP6
Variant 2-189007934-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189007934-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 404306.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000131 (20/152098) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000279 (19/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000182. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 7 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | NM_000090.4 | c.3413C>T | p.Pro1138Leu | missense_variant | 46/51 | ENST00000304636.9 | NP_000081.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | ENST00000304636.9 | c.3413C>T | p.Pro1138Leu | missense_variant | 46/51 | 1 | NM_000090.4 | ENSP00000304408.4 | ||
COL3A1 | ENST00000450867.2 | c.3314C>T | p.Pro1105Leu | missense_variant | 45/50 | 1 | ENSP00000415346.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 33AN: 251428Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135892
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
251428
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135892
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000136 AC: 199AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000149 AC XY: 108AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
199
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
108
AN XY:
727238
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152098Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74298
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74298
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
22
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 18, 2023 | This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 1138 of the COL3A1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 55/282810 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jan 03, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 23, 2024 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 16, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Aug 29, 2024 | This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 1138 of the COL3A1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 55/282810 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 28, 2024 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Occurs in the triple helical domain at the X position in the canonical Gly-X-Y repeat; although this variant may have an effect on normal protein folding and function, missense substitution at the X position is not a common mechanism of disease (HGMD) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 26, 2024 | BS1 - |
COL3A1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 18, 2024 | The COL3A1 c.3413C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro1138Leu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.039% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at