rs201887750

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000143.4(FH):c.53C>T(p.Pro18Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00104 in 1,547,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P18A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0056 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

FH
NM_000143.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.18

Variant links:

Genes affected

FH (HGNC:3700): (fumarate hydratase) The protein encoded by this gene is an enzymatic component of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, or Krebs cycle, and catalyzes the formation of L-malate from fumarate. It exists in both a cytosolic form and an N-terminal extended form, differing only in the translation start site used. The N-terminal extended form is targeted to the mitochondrion, where the removal of the extension generates the same form as in the cytoplasm. It is similar to some thermostable class II fumarases and functions as a homotetramer. Mutations in this gene can cause fumarase deficiency and lead to progressive encephalopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FH links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

PP2

Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 132 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 17 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 1.2708 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 2.0634 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma, fumaric aciduria, hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer, leiomyosarcoma, pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005271375).

BP6

Variant 1-241519670-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-241519670-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134413.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-241519670-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00556 (847/152368) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0194 (807/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0183. There are 9 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 348 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position FAILED quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 847 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FH	NM_000143.4 link	c.53C>T	p.Pro18Leu	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 10	ENST00000366560.4	NP_000134.2	P07954-1A0A0S2Z4C3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FH	ENST00000366560.4 link	c.53C>T	p.Pro18Leu	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 10	1	NM_000143.4	ENSP00000355518.4		P07954-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00556

AC:

846

AN:

152250

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0194

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00525

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00149

AC:

217

AN:

146004

AF XY:

0.00120

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0252

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000749

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00120

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000550

AC:

767

AN:

1395434

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000448

AC XY:

308

AN XY:

688114

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0202

AC:

634

AN:

31462

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00135

AC:

AN:

35638

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25130

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35694

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

79022

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

48320

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000742

AC:

AN:

1078312

Gnomad4 Remaining exome

AF:

0.00130

AC:

AN:

57756

Heterozygous variant carriers

134

178

223

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00556

AC:

847

AN:

152368

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00467

AC XY:

348

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0194

AC:

0.0194056

AN:

0.0194056

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00170

AC:

0.00169846

AN:

0.00169846

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

0.0000440969

AN:

0.0000440969

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00520

AC:

0.00519849

AN:

0.00519849

Heterozygous variant carriers

131

175

219

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00257

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00665

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0123

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00102

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:reference population

- -

Jul 30, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: FH c.53C>T (p.Pro18Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0021 in 171230 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.021 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 8400-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FH causing Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.53C>T in individuals affected with Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Dec 26, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer

Benign:4

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 17, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 14, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fumarase deficiency;C1708350:Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer

Benign:2

Nov 10, 2023

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 14, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fumarase deficiency

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 04, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 22, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.26

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.23

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.090

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.27

Eigen

Benign

-0.87

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.81

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.21

LIST_S2

Benign

0.61

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0053

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.56

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.37

REVEL

Uncertain

0.39

Sift

Benign

0.030

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.049

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.23

MVP

0.88

MPC

0.29

ClinPred

0.012

GERP RS

4.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.069

gMVP

0.55

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over