rs201899557

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.735-9G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000372 in 1,611,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000038 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0003444

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.697

Variant links:

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).

BP6

Variant 19-1221204-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1221204-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 215741.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000384 (56/1459116) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000425 (19/44656). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000278. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 26 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 56 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 link	c.735-9G>A	intron_variant	Intron 5 of 9	ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NM_001407255.1 link	c.735-9G>A	intron_variant	Intron 5 of 8		NP_001394184.1
STK11	NR_176325.1 link	n.2002-9G>A	intron_variant	Intron 6 of 10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 link	c.735-9G>A	intron_variant	Intron 5 of 9	1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6	Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000652231.1 link	c.735-9G>A	intron_variant	Intron 5 of 8			ENSP00000498804.1	Q15831-2
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 link	c.363-9G>A	intron_variant	Intron 7 of 11	3		ENSP00000477641.2	A0A087WT72

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152098

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000929

AC:

AN:

247564

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000890

AC XY:

AN XY:

134840

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000494

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000557

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000358

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000167

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000384

AC:

AN:

1459116

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000358

AC XY:

AN XY:

725682

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000425

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000297

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000498

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74434

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000676

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000567

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

May 29, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 12, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: STK11 c.735-9G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.3e-05 in 247564 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00049 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 78-fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in STK11 causing Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.735-9G>A in individuals affected with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Sep 07, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 18, 2024

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 27, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Benign:3

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The STK11 c.735-9G>A variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang University, and in the Insight Hereditary Tumors databases. The variant was not identified in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs201899557) as with likely benign allele and in the ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as likely benign by Invitae and Color Genomics. The variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 1 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002). The variant was identified in control databases in 23 of 245260 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 5454 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 17 of 33522 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), European Non-Finnish in 4 of 111066 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), East Asian in 1 of 17230 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), while the variant was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.78

CADD

Benign

7.4

DANN

Benign

0.85

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00034

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.17

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over