rs201916135
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_133379.5(TTN):c.15386C>T(p.Thr5129Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,613,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_133379.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_133379.5 | c.15386C>T | p.Thr5129Ile | missense_variant | 46/46 | ENST00000360870.10 | NP_596870.2 | |
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.11312-5093C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000360870.10 | c.15386C>T | p.Thr5129Ile | missense_variant | 46/46 | 5 | NM_133379.5 | ENSP00000354117 | ||
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.11312-5093C>T | intron_variant | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141 | P1 | |||
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.1223+4044G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151948Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250616Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135438
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726970
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152066Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74334
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at