rs201926295

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_005236.3(ERCC4):​c.2677A>G​(p.Asn893Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000406 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00034 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC4
NM_005236.3 missense

Scores

1
2
16

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.90

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC4 (HGNC:3436): (ERCC excision repair 4, endonuclease catalytic subunit) The protein encoded by this gene forms a complex with ERCC1 and is involved in the 5' incision made during nucleotide excision repair. This complex is a structure specific DNA repair endonuclease that interacts with EME1. Defects in this gene are a cause of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XP-F), or xeroderma pigmentosum VI (XP6).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
ERCC4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • xeroderma pigmentosum group F
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group Q
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • XFE progeroid syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • xeroderma pigmentosum
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • xeroderma pigmentosum-Cockayne syndrome complex
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13524413).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC4NM_005236.3 linkc.2677A>G p.Asn893Asp missense_variant Exon 11 of 11 ENST00000311895.8 NP_005227.1 Q92889-1A0A1W1GSK9
ERCC4XM_011522424.4 linkc.2815A>G p.Asn939Asp missense_variant Exon 12 of 12 XP_011520726.1 A0A804HKF9
ERCC4XM_047433774.1 linkc.1888A>G p.Asn630Asp missense_variant Exon 8 of 8 XP_047289730.1
ERCC4XM_011522427.2 linkc.1327A>G p.Asn443Asp missense_variant Exon 6 of 6 XP_011520729.1 B4DXD8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC4ENST00000311895.8 linkc.2677A>G p.Asn893Asp missense_variant Exon 11 of 11 1 NM_005236.3 ENSP00000310520.7 Q92889-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000335
AC:
51
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000267
AC:
67
AN:
251250
AF XY:
0.000250
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000413
AC:
604
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000399
AC XY:
290
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000239
AC:
8
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53376
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000516
AC:
574
AN:
1111998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000315
AC:
19
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
36
71
107
142
178
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000335
AC:
51
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000336
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74334
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
8
AN:
41438
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000327
AC:
5
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000544
AC:
37
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000478
AC:
1
AN:
2094
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.511
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000419
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000295
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000228
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000239
AC:
29
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F Uncertain:2
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 02, 2024
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ERCC4 c.2677A>G (p.Asn893Asp) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.048% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia or Xeroderma pigmentosum. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

not specified Uncertain:1
May 19, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cockayne syndrome;C0268140:Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q Uncertain:1
Oct 05, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 893 of the ERCC4 protein (p.Asn893Asp). This variant is present in population databases (rs201926295, gnomAD 0.05%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ERCC4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 579347). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt ERCC4 protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Xeroderma pigmentosum Uncertain:1
Jun 28, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Oct 01, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.2677A>G (p.N893D) alteration is located in coding exon 11 of the ERCC4 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 2677, causing the asparagine (N) at amino acid position 893 to be replaced by an aspartic acid (D). Based on data from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) database, the ERCC4 c.2677A>G alteration was observed in 0.03% (74/282652) of total alleles studied, with a frequency of 0.05% (62/129044) in the European (non-Finnish) subpopulation. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. The p.N893D alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

ERCC4-related disorder Uncertain:1
Aug 02, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ERCC4 c.2677A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn893Asp. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.048% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

not provided Uncertain:1
May 21, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.46
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.0034
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.095
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.016
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.14
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L
PhyloP100
6.9
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.68
N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.28
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.36
T
Polyphen
0.38
B
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.66
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
0.068
T
GERP RS
6.2
Varity_R
0.66
gMVP
0.63
Mutation Taster
=65/35
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201926295; hg19: chr16-14042130; API