rs201956727
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 4P and 5B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_018941.4(CLN8):āc.776A>Gā(p.Asn259Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000279 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N259N) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018941.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN8 | NM_018941.4 | c.776A>G | p.Asn259Ser | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000331222.6 | NP_061764.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN8 | ENST00000331222.6 | c.776A>G | p.Asn259Ser | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_018941.4 | ENSP00000328182.4 | ||
KBTBD11-OT1 | ENST00000635855.1 | n.543+8885A>G | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000489726.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000716 AC: 18AN: 251432Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000515 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000274 AC: 40AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 20, 2024 | In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Feb 12, 2020 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 25, 2022 | This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 259 of the CLN8 protein (p.Asn259Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs201956727, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CLN8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 205210). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CLN8 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 20, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at