rs201963060
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):āc.8161A>Gā(p.Ile2721Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000764 in 1,596,534 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032119.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.8161A>G | p.Ile2721Val | missense_variant | 35/90 | ENST00000405460.9 | NP_115495.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.8161A>G | p.Ile2721Val | missense_variant | 35/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | ENSP00000384582 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000565 AC: 86AN: 152162Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000516 AC: 121AN: 234526Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000559 AC XY: 71AN XY: 126996
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000785 AC: 1134AN: 1444254Hom.: 0 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.000771 AC XY: 554AN XY: 718090
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000565 AC: 86AN: 152280Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000484 AC XY: 36AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 21, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | ADGRV1: BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 25, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32707200) - |
Usher syndrome type 2C Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 17, 2012 | p.Ile2721Val in exon 35 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. In addition, computational prediction tools do not suggest a high likelihood of im pact to the protein. It has been identified in 0.13% (60/38684) of European chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs201963060). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at