rs201963508
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):c.2548A>G(p.Thr850Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000176 in 1,593,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T850S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_181426.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_181426.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC39 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.2548A>G | p.Thr850Ala | missense | Exon 18 of 20 | ENSP00000417960.2 | Q9UFE4-1 | ||
| TTC14 | TSL:1 | c.1775-826T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000372027.4 | Q96N46-2 | |||
| CCDC39 | c.2455A>G | p.Thr819Ala | missense | Exon 17 of 19 | ENSP00000606126.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000129 AC: 30AN: 233328 AF XY: 0.000127 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000185 AC: 267AN: 1441358Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000180 AC XY: 129AN XY: 715406 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000919 AC: 14AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74478 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at