rs201963508
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):āc.2548A>Gā(p.Thr850Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000176 in 1,593,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_181426.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC39 | NM_181426.2 | c.2548A>G | p.Thr850Ala | missense_variant | 18/20 | ENST00000476379.6 | NP_852091.1 | |
TTC14 | NM_001288582.2 | c.1775-826T>C | intron_variant | NP_001275511.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC39 | ENST00000476379.6 | c.2548A>G | p.Thr850Ala | missense_variant | 18/20 | 2 | NM_181426.2 | ENSP00000417960.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000129 AC: 30AN: 233328Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000127 AC XY: 16AN XY: 126326
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000185 AC: 267AN: 1441358Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000180 AC XY: 129AN XY: 715406
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000919 AC: 14AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2023 | CCDC39: PM2, BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 17, 2024 | In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 12, 2022 | This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 850 of the CCDC39 protein (p.Thr850Ala). This variant is present in population databases (rs201963508, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CCDC39-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 219718). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The alanine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 17, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 14 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 16, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at