dbSNP rs201982464: SOS1:c.3391+7A>G (chr2-38989263-T-C) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-8 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.3391+7A>G variant in the SOS1 gene is 0.193% (41/16108) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA136138/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00067 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SOS1
NM_005633.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.003602

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.01

Variant links:

Genes affected

SOS1 (HGNC:11187): (SOS Ras/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAS proteins, membrane proteins that bind guanine nucleotides and participate in signal transduction pathways. GTP binding activates and GTP hydrolysis inactivates RAS proteins. The product of this gene may regulate RAS proteins by facilitating the exchange of GTP for GDP. Mutations in this gene are associated with gingival fibromatosis 1 and Noonan syndrome type 4. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SOS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BA1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SOS1	NM_005633.4 link	c.3391+7A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 21 of 22	ENST00000402219.8	NP_005624.2	Q07889-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SOS1	ENST00000402219.8 link	c.3391+7A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 21 of 22	1	NM_005633.4	ENSP00000384675.2		Q07889-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000618

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000828

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000715

AC:

179

AN:

250474

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000842

AC XY:

114

AN XY:

135376

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000370

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000707

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000329

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000668

AC:

957

AN:

1433078

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000762

AC XY:

545

AN XY:

714766

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000152

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00253

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000281

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000590

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000617

AC:

AN:

152284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

74444

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000829

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000701

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000499

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000601

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:6

Oct 23, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 19, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SOS1: BS1 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The SOS1 c.3391+7A>G variant involves the alteration of a conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 94/118614 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) at a frequency of 0.0007925, which is approximately 26 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SOS1 variant (0.00003), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Ths variant has been reported in affected individual and reported as a "disease-unrelated variant" by authors (Lepri_2011). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases recently classified this variant as benign/VUS. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

not specified

Benign:4

Dec 22, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

c.3391+7A>G in intron 21 of SOS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.3% (41/16108) of South Asian chromosomes including one homozygous individual and 0.07% (45/65182) European chromosomes by the Exome Ag gregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs201982464). -

May 14, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RASopathy

Benign:2

Apr 18, 2017

ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.3391+7A>G variant in the SOS1 gene is 0.193% (41/16108) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Noonan syndrome 4

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Fibromatosis, gingival, 1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome

Benign:1

Jun 01, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.94

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0036

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.15

SpliceAI score (max)

0.54

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DL_spliceai

0.54

Position offset: 7

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over