rs201995780

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000293.3(PHKB):​c.1459-9G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000352 in 1,612,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PHKB
NM_000293.3 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001482
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0890
Variant links:
Genes affected
PHKB (HGNC:8927): (phosphorylase kinase regulatory subunit beta) Phosphorylase kinase is a polymer of 16 subunits, four each of alpha, beta, gamma and delta. The alpha subunit includes the skeletal muscle and hepatic isoforms, encoded by two different genes. The beta subunit is the same in both the muscle and hepatic isoforms, encoded by this gene, which is a member of the phosphorylase b kinase regulatory subunit family. The gamma subunit also includes the skeletal muscle and hepatic isoforms, encoded by two different genes. The delta subunit is a calmodulin and can be encoded by three different genes. The gamma subunits contain the active site of the enzyme, whereas the alpha and beta subunits have regulatory functions controlled by phosphorylation. The delta subunit mediates the dependence of the enzyme on calcium concentration. Mutations in this gene cause glycogen storage disease type 9B, also known as phosphorylase kinase deficiency of liver and muscle. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified in this gene. Two pseudogenes have been found on chromosomes 14 and 20, respectively.[provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 16-47641026-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-47641026-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194467.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00112 (170/152166) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00265 (110/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00225. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 72 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PHKBNM_000293.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1459-9G>T intron_variant ENST00000323584.10 NP_000284.1 Q93100-1
PHKBNM_001363837.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1459-9G>T intron_variant NP_001350766.1
PHKBNM_001031835.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1438-9G>T intron_variant NP_001027005.1 Q93100-4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PHKBENST00000323584.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1459-9G>T intron_variant 1 NM_000293.3 ENSP00000313504.5 Q93100-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
168
AN:
152048
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00261
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000537
AC:
135
AN:
251440
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000442
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00133
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000272
AC:
397
AN:
1460442
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000255
AC XY:
185
AN XY:
726634
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000562
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000158
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000762
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00112
AC:
170
AN:
152166
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000968
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00190
Alfa
AF:
0.000834
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00162
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease IXb Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 27, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 08, 2022- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 06, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 28, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.27
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000015
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201995780; hg19: chr16-47674937; API