Menu
GeneBe

rs201998680

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_017777.4(MKS1):c.1014G>A(p.Leu338=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000749 in 1,613,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L338L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00059 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00077 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

MKS1
NM_017777.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.886
Variant links:
Genes affected
MKS1 (HGNC:7121): (MKS transition zone complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the basal body and is required for formation of the primary cilium in ciliated epithelial cells. Mutations in this gene result in Meckel syndrome type 1 and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 13. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).
BP6
Variant 17-58210669-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58210669-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 260878.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000591 (90/152278) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0174 (84/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0144. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 64 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MKS1NM_017777.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1014G>A p.Leu338= synonymous_variant 11/18 ENST00000393119.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MKS1ENST00000393119.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1014G>A p.Leu338= synonymous_variant 11/181 NM_017777.4 P1Q9NXB0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000591
AC:
90
AN:
152160
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00154
AC:
383
AN:
249508
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00198
AC XY:
268
AN XY:
135360
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000618
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000825
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000766
AC:
1119
AN:
1461414
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00108
AC XY:
787
AN XY:
727056
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000459
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000828
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000591
AC:
90
AN:
152278
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000859
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000112
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000113
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
22
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meckel syndrome, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024MKS1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 22, 2020- -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
Cadd
Benign
6.2
Dann
Benign
0.70
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201998680; hg19: chr17-56288030; API