rs202011521
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.825G>A(p.Pro275Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000116 in 1,610,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous
NM_000455.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -5.50
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 19-1221303-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1221303-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 139336.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=7}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.5 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 18 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.825G>A | p.Pro275Pro | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | NP_000446.1 | |
STK11 | NM_001407255.1 | c.825G>A | p.Pro275Pro | synonymous_variant | 6/9 | NP_001394184.1 | ||
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.2092G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 7/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.825G>A | p.Pro275Pro | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | ENSP00000324856.6 | ||
STK11 | ENST00000652231.1 | c.825G>A | p.Pro275Pro | synonymous_variant | 6/9 | ENSP00000498804.1 | ||||
STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.453G>A | p.Pro151Pro | synonymous_variant | 8/12 | 3 | ENSP00000477641.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000206 AC: 50AN: 242674Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000212 AC XY: 28AN XY: 132220
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
50
AN:
242674
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
132220
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000116 AC: 169AN: 1457974Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000109 AC XY: 79AN XY: 725050
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
169
AN:
1457974
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
725050
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74338
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74338
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 30, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 30, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 31, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 29, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 26, 2020 | - - |
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Jan 11, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 27, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Aug 22, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 05, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 14, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The STK11 p.Pro275= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the following databases: Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs202011521) as “With other allele”, ClinVar (as benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and Invitae, as likely benign by Quest Diagnostics and Color Genomics, and as uncertain significance by Ilumina), and Clinvitae (with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity). The variant was identified in control databases in 53 of 271464 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000195 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 23358 chromosomes (freq: 0.000086), Other in 3 of 6346 chromosomes (freq: 0.000473), Latino in 8 of 33978 chromosomes (freq: 0.000235), European (Non-Finnish) in 13 of 123704 chromosomes (freq: 0.000105), Ashkenazi Jewish in 27 of 9978 chromosomes (freq: 0.002706); it was not observed in the East Asian, European (Finnish), and South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing with a possible creation of a cryptic splice site; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The p.Pro275= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2024 | STK11: BP4, BP7 - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 09, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at