rs202023896
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.8202G>A(p.Val2734Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 1,613,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001376.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000598 AC: 15AN: 250926Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000516 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135696
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000112 AC: 164AN: 1461502Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000977 AC XY: 71AN XY: 727070
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at