Menu
GeneBe

rs202081420

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.2887+10G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000385 in 1,613,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.755
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 9-95459590-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95459590-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135886.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-95459590-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 45 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2887+10G>A intron_variant ENST00000331920.11
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2884+10G>A intron_variant ENST00000437951.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.2887+10G>A intron_variant 5 NM_000264.5 A2Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2884+10G>A intron_variant 5 NM_001083603.3 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000296
AC:
45
AN:
152216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000531
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000207
AC:
52
AN:
251400
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000221
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
135890
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000554
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000334
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000394
AC:
576
AN:
1460804
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000363
AC XY:
264
AN XY:
726734
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000488
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000216
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000295
AC:
45
AN:
152334
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000269
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000553
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000280

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gorlin syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Holoprosencephaly 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
Cadd
Benign
0.45
Dann
Benign
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs202081420; hg19: chr9-98221872; API