rs202132383

Positions:

chr22-36288366-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.4818G>A(p.Ser1606=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000379 in 1,613,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00034 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.23

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

MYH9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).

BP6

Variant 22-36288366-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36288366-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 290063.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.23 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000341 (52/152304) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00105 (16/15292). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000656. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 24 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 52 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.4818G>A	p.Ser1606=	synonymous_variant	34/41	ENST00000216181.11	NP_002464.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYH9	ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.4818G>A	p.Ser1606=	synonymous_variant	34/41	1	NM_002473.6	ENSP00000216181	P1	P35579-1
MYH9	ENST00000685801.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.4881G>A	p.Ser1627=	synonymous_variant	35/42			ENSP00000510688
MYH9	ENST00000691109.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.5113G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	28/35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000342

AC:

AN:

152186

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000514

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000295

AC:

AN:

251074

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000287

AC XY:

AN XY:

135738

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000347

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000475

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000383

AC:

560

AN:

1461360

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000424

AC XY:

308

AN XY:

727006

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000896

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000470

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000466

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000265

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000341

AC:

AN:

152304

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000322

AC XY:

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000514

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000396

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000672

EpiCase

AF:

0.000600

EpiControl

AF:

0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Nov 29, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 05, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	May 01, 2017	- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Jun 09, 2016

p.Ser1606Ser in exon 34 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, and it is not locat ed within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 25/66702 Eur opean chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadin stitute.org; dbSNP rs202132383). -

MYH9-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

0.42

DANN

Benign

0.72

RBP_binding_hub_radar

1.1

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over