rs202133782

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):c.3528C>T(p.His1176His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000117 in 1,608,490 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH1
NM_017617.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.883

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOTCH1 (HGNC:7881): (notch receptor 1) This gene encodes a member of the NOTCH family of proteins. Members of this Type I transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple different domain types. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway that regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells through binding of Notch family receptors to their cognate ligands. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed in the trans-Golgi network to generate two polypeptide chains that heterodimerize to form the mature cell-surface receptor. This receptor plays a role in the development of numerous cell and tissue types. Mutations in this gene are associated with aortic valve disease, Adams-Oliver syndrome, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

NOTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).

BP6

Variant 9-136507420-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136507420-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 289720.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-136507420-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.883 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000223 (34/152258) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00484 (25/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00336. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 34 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NOTCH1	NM_017617.5 link	c.3528C>T	p.His1176His	synonymous_variant	Exon 22 of 34	ENST00000651671.1	NP_060087.3	P46531
NOTCH1	XM_011518717.3 link	c.2805C>T	p.His935His	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 31		XP_011517019.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NOTCH1	ENST00000651671.1 link	c.3528C>T	p.His1176His	synonymous_variant	Exon 22 of 34		NM_017617.5	ENSP00000498587.1		P46531

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000223

AC:

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00482

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000259

AC:

AN:

235608

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000303

AC XY:

AN XY:

128662

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000181

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00261

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000944

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000106

AC:

154

AN:

1456232

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000123

AC XY:

AN XY:

724074

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000598

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000137

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00195

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000584

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000549

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000499

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000223

AC:

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00484

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000966

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000189

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 29, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 05, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:2

Mar 04, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 13, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 20, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

NOTCH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 03, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Adams-Oliver syndrome 5

Benign:1

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

3.0

DANN

Benign

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over