rs202185465

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.91557T>C(p.Asp30519=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,612,566 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00073 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.78

Variant links:

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN links:

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

TTN-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).

BP6

Variant 2-178550974-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178550974-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 137812.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr2-178550974-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178550974-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.78 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.91557T>C	p.Asp30519=	synonymous_variant	336/363	ENST00000589042.5
TTN-AS1	NR_038272.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.2043+8613A>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.91557T>C	p.Asp30519=	synonymous_variant	336/363	5	NM_001267550.2	P1
TTN-AS1	ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.416+27338A>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000730

AC:

111

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000328

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000899

AC:

222

AN:

246834

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000932

AC XY:

125

AN XY:

134106

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000324

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000117

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00169

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000819

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00146

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000667

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00136

AC:

1988

AN:

1460310

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00132

AC XY:

962

AN XY:

726438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000239

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000859

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00161

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00103

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000729

AC:

111

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000645

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000865

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00118

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000737

EpiCase

AF:

0.00125

EpiControl

AF:

0.000653

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 30, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 27, 2019	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	May 21, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Jan 23, 2017	p.Asp27951Asp in exon 285 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.1% (83/62394) of European (Non-Finnish) chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs202185465). -

not provided

Benign:5

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Aug 01, 2023	TTN: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 25, 2024

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Mar 19, 2020

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

TTN-related condition

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Aug 26, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Nov 30, 2018

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

Cadd

Benign

0.070

Dann

Benign

0.83

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over