rs202228407

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.3099T>C​(p.Pro1033Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000139 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.625
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 17-61683947-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61683947-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184008.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.625 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00014 (205/1461876) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00456 (204/44724). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00405. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 77 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkc.3099T>C p.Pro1033Pro synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 20 ENST00000259008.7 NP_114432.2 Q9BX63-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkc.3099T>C p.Pro1033Pro synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 20 1 NM_032043.3 ENSP00000259008.2 Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000756
AC:
190
AN:
251452
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000515
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00546
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000140
AC:
205
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000106
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000169
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000336

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Feb 03, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 09, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The BRIP1 c.3099T>C (p.Pro1033Pro) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 75/121402 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0064778 (75/11578). This frequency is about 104 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRIP1 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 01, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 15, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Jun 26, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:2
Mar 07, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 11, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Oct 11, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Feb 28, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Oct 11, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
3.7
DANN
Benign
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs202228407; hg19: chr17-59761308; API