rs2028373

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_020661.4(AICDA):​c.465C>T​(p.His155His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.618 in 1,609,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 312,561 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.54 ( 23255 hom., cov: 26)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.63 ( 289306 hom. )

Consequence

AICDA
NM_020661.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.164

Publications

29 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AICDA (HGNC:13203): (activation induced cytidine deaminase) This gene encodes a RNA-editing deaminase that is a member of the cytidine deaminase family. AICDA is specifically expressed and active in germinal center-like B cells. In the germinal center, AICDA is involved in somatic hypermutation, gene conversion, and class-switch recombination of immunoglobulin genes. An epigenetic role in neoplastic transformation and lymphoma progression has been experimentally ascribed to AICDA using mouse models. Defects in this gene are the cause of autosomal recessive hyper-IgM immunodeficiency syndrome type 2 (HIGM2). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]
AICDA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hyper-IgM syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.02).
BP6
Variant 12-8604885-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-8604885-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261353.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.164 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.641 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AICDANM_020661.4 linkc.465C>T p.His155His synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 5 ENST00000229335.11 NP_065712.1 Q9GZX7-1Q546Y9Q7Z599
AICDANM_001330343.2 linkc.435C>T p.His145His synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 5 NP_001317272.1 Q9GZX7-2Q7Z599
AICDANM_001410970.1 linkc.427+330C>T intron_variant Intron 3 of 3 NP_001397899.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AICDAENST00000229335.11 linkc.465C>T p.His155His synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 5 1 NM_020661.4 ENSP00000229335.6 Q9GZX7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.542
AC:
80823
AN:
149028
Hom.:
23245
Cov.:
26
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.319
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.649
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.626
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.601
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.484
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.544
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.616
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.561
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.646
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.557
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.597
AC:
148184
AN:
248232
AF XY:
0.598
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.312
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.665
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.601
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.503
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.611
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.641
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.604
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.625
AC:
913525
AN:
1460840
Hom.:
289306
Cov.:
66
AF XY:
0.625
AC XY:
453963
AN XY:
726714
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.302
AC:
10096
AN:
33396
American (AMR)
AF:
0.663
AC:
29513
AN:
44502
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.594
AC:
15497
AN:
26098
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.469
AC:
18597
AN:
39668
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.551
AC:
47463
AN:
86066
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.610
AC:
32535
AN:
53318
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.550
AC:
3135
AN:
5704
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.648
AC:
720384
AN:
1111758
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.602
AC:
36305
AN:
60330
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20187
40373
60560
80746
100933
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18778
37556
56334
75112
93890
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.542
AC:
80853
AN:
149126
Hom.:
23255
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
0.543
AC XY:
39353
AN XY:
72528
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.319
AC:
12916
AN:
40544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.626
AC:
9385
AN:
14990
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.601
AC:
2072
AN:
3450
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.485
AC:
2443
AN:
5034
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.545
AC:
2577
AN:
4726
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.616
AC:
5908
AN:
9592
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.573
AC:
165
AN:
288
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.646
AC:
43661
AN:
67546
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.555
AC:
1139
AN:
2052
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1645
3289
4934
6578
8223
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
700
1400
2100
2800
3500
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.604
Hom.:
96971
Bravo
AF:
0.533
Asia WGS
AF:
0.457
AC:
1590
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.644
EpiControl
AF:
0.639

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hyper-IgM syndrome type 2 Benign:5
Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Jan 24, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 86% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 82. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Sep 28, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2Other:1
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
3.0
DANN
Benign
0.45
PhyloP100
-0.16
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2028373; hg19: chr12-8757481; COSMIC: COSV57564585; API