rs2042996

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.64208C>T​(p.Thr21403Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.275 in 1,612,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73,844 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.36 ( 11527 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.27 ( 62317 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.88
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=3.70831E-6).
BP6
Variant 2-178586693-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178586693-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47209.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178586693-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.687 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.64208C>T p.Thr21403Ile missense_variant Exon 308 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.64208C>T p.Thr21403Ile missense_variant Exon 308 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.357
AC:
54190
AN:
151798
Hom.:
11474
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.528
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.560
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.380
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.706
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.520
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.286
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.275
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.223
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.326
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.351
AC:
87295
AN:
248600
Hom.:
18473
AF XY:
0.348
AC XY:
46986
AN XY:
134868
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.529
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.426
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.709
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.519
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.277
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.224
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.306
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.267
AC:
389609
AN:
1460900
Hom.:
62317
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.272
AC XY:
197731
AN XY:
726748
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.540
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.425
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.696
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.507
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.276
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.215
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.301
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.357
AC:
54309
AN:
151918
Hom.:
11527
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.367
AC XY:
27270
AN XY:
74238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.529
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.380
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.706
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.519
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.286
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.223
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.334
Alfa
AF:
0.263
Hom.:
13170
Bravo
AF:
0.371
TwinsUK
AF:
0.211
AC:
784
ALSPAC
AF:
0.214
AC:
824
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.508
AC:
2009
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.220
AC:
1837
ExAC
AF:
0.351
AC:
42389
Asia WGS
AF:
0.617
AC:
2143
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.219
EpiControl
AF:
0.228

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Aug 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 05, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 27, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 02, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.027
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.77
Eigen
Benign
-0.63
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.26
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.20
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.46
T;T;T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000037
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-3.6
.;.;.;N;.;.;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Benign
3.0
N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.058
MPC
0.090
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
6.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2042996; hg19: chr2-179451420; COSMIC: COSV60092466; COSMIC: COSV60092466; API