rs2057227
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000434552.3(LINC02629):n.370+90G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.654 in 151,678 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32,735 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.65 ( 32721 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.49 ( 14 hom. )
Consequence
LINC02629
ENST00000434552.3 intron
ENST00000434552.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.20
Publications
1 publications found
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.96).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.772 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINC02629 | NR_170279.1 | n.712+90G>A | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 5 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINC02629 | ENST00000434552.3 | n.370+90G>A | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.654 AC: 99018AN: 151452Hom.: 32704 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
99018
AN:
151452
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.491 AC: 53AN: 108Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.530 AC XY: 35AN XY: 66 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
108
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
66
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AC:
0
AN:
0
American (AMR)
AC:
0
AN:
0
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
2
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
2
South Asian (SAS)
AC:
0
AN:
0
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
66
Middle Eastern (MID)
AC:
0
AN:
0
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
30
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
8
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.654 AC: 99083AN: 151570Hom.: 32721 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.663 AC XY: 49116AN XY: 74080 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
99083
AN:
151570
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
49116
AN XY:
74080
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
28555
AN:
41188
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
11066
AN:
15234
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
2279
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3484
AN:
5130
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
3812
AN:
4806
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
7063
AN:
10512
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
184
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
40662
AN:
67922
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1382
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1709
3417
5126
6834
8543
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
796
1592
2388
3184
3980
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2481
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.