rs2066520

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_014140.4(SMARCAL1):c.1271A>T(p.Asp424Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00301 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

SMARCAL1
NM_014140.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.18

Variant links:

Genes affected

SMARCAL1 (HGNC:11102): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a like 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein shows sequence similarity to the E. coli RNA polymerase-binding protein HepA. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia (SIOD), an autosomal recessive disorder with the diagnostic features of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, renal dysfunction, and T-cell immunodeficiency. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SMARCAL1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014533311).

BP6

Variant 2-216428719-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-216428719-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 283080.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr2-216428719-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00212 (323/152334) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00353 (240/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00316. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 144 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SMARCAL1	NM_014140.4 link	c.1271A>T	p.Asp424Val	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 18	ENST00000357276.9	NP_054859.2	Q9NZC9
SMARCAL1	NM_001127207.2 link	c.1271A>T	p.Asp424Val	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 18		NP_001120679.1	Q9NZC9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SMARCAL1	ENST00000357276.9 link	c.1271A>T	p.Asp424Val	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 18	2	NM_014140.4	ENSP00000349823.4		Q9NZC9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00212

AC:

323

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000507

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0121

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00177

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00230

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00353

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00229

AC:

577

AN:

251494

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00232

AC XY:

315

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00337

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00147

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00102

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00351

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00423

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00310

AC:

4536

AN:

1461870

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00311

AC XY:

2260

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00121

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00302

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00363

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00270

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00212

AC:

323

AN:

152334

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00193

AC XY:

144

AN XY:

74504

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000505

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00230

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00353

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00284

Alfa

AF:

0.00322

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00238

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00324

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00234

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000681

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00244

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00232

AC:

282

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00311

EpiControl

AF:

0.00385

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SMARCAL1: BS1 -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 19, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Dec 31, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 30, 2021

Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SMARCAL1 NM_014140.3 exon 7 p.Asp424Val (c.1271A>T):This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.3% (453/129196) of European alleles, including 2 homozygotes in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-217293442-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as Likely Benign or Benign (Variation ID:283080). Evolutionary conservation suggests that this variant may impact the protein; computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease, but requires further evidence. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Kidney disorder

Uncertain:1

Dec 12, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 21, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

SMARCAL1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 05, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.17

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.15

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.44

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.31

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.47

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

.;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.096

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.31

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.6

M;M;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.52

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.5

D;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.56

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;D;D;T

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D;D;D

Polyphen

0.040

B;B;.;.

Vest4

0.67

MVP

0.97

MPC

0.98

ClinPred

0.077

GERP RS

6.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.61

gMVP

0.79

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over