rs2066827
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_004064.5(CDKN1B):c.326T>A(p.Val109Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000359 in 1,613,412 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V109G) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004064.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN1B | NM_004064.5 | c.326T>A | p.Val109Asp | missense_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000228872.9 | NP_004055.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN1B | ENST00000228872.9 | c.326T>A | p.Val109Asp | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_004064.5 | ENSP00000228872 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000161 AC: 40AN: 248658Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000170 AC XY: 23AN XY: 135178
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000363 AC: 53AN: 1461162Hom.: 0 Cov.: 59 AF XY: 0.0000454 AC XY: 33AN XY: 726854
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Jul 12, 2022 | The CDKN1B c.326T>A (p.Val109Asp) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.099% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 14, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 12, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 28, 2022 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 16, 2022 | - - |
CDKN1B-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 26, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at