rs2069569
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003235.5(TG):c.7501T>C(p.Trp2501Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.525 in 1,613,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 228,035 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. W2501Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003235.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003235.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.7501T>C | p.Trp2501Arg | missense | Exon 43 of 48 | ENSP00000220616.4 | P01266-1 | ||
| SLA | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-319+6251A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000337548.5 | Q13239-1 | |||
| SLA | TSL:1 | c.11+6251A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000378759.3 | Q13239-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.585 AC: 88946AN: 151970Hom.: 27559 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.496 AC: 124629AN: 251420 AF XY: 0.492 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.518 AC: 757575AN: 1461856Hom.: 200444 Cov.: 57 AF XY: 0.515 AC XY: 374669AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.585 AC: 89025AN: 152084Hom.: 27591 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.578 AC XY: 42977AN XY: 74330 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at