rs2071238
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001371623.1(TCOF1):c.1578C>T(p.Pro526Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.156 in 1,612,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20,628 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001371623.1 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Treacher Collins syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Treacher-Collins syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCOF1 | NM_001371623.1 | c.1578C>T | p.Pro526Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 11 of 27 | ENST00000643257.2 | NP_001358552.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.173 AC: 26247AN: 151590Hom.: 2489 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.142 AC: 35687AN: 250908 AF XY: 0.141 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.154 AC: 224991AN: 1461032Hom.: 18134 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.153 AC XY: 111326AN XY: 726732 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.173 AC: 26295AN: 151704Hom.: 2494 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.171 AC XY: 12643AN XY: 74132 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Treacher Collins syndrome 1 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at