rs2073376
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006031.6(PCNT):āc.8375A>Gā(p.Gln2792Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.63 in 1,613,546 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 322,770 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006031.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | NM_006031.6 | c.8375A>G | p.Gln2792Arg | missense_variant | 38/47 | ENST00000359568.10 | NP_006022.3 | |
PCNT | NM_001315529.2 | c.8021A>G | p.Gln2674Arg | missense_variant | 38/47 | NP_001302458.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | ENST00000359568.10 | c.8375A>G | p.Gln2792Arg | missense_variant | 38/47 | 1 | NM_006031.6 | ENSP00000352572.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.671 AC: 102083AN: 152028Hom.: 34935 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.627 AC: 156951AN: 250436Hom.: 50038 AF XY: 0.629 AC XY: 85209AN XY: 135434
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.625 AC: 913994AN: 1461402Hom.: 287790 Cov.: 71 AF XY: 0.627 AC XY: 455793AN XY: 727008
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.672 AC: 102180AN: 152144Hom.: 34980 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.666 AC XY: 49559AN XY: 74368
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 12, 2014 | - - |
PCNT-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 19, 2022 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at