rs2073470
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001110556.2(FLNA):c.663C>T(p.Pro221=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00435 in 1,209,832 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 154 homozygotes. There are 1,500 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P221P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110556.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLNA | NM_001110556.2 | c.663C>T | p.Pro221= | synonymous_variant | 4/48 | ENST00000369850.10 | |
FLNA | NM_001456.4 | c.663C>T | p.Pro221= | synonymous_variant | 4/47 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLNA | ENST00000369850.10 | c.663C>T | p.Pro221= | synonymous_variant | 4/48 | 1 | NM_001110556.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00509 AC: 572AN: 112354Hom.: 11 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00533 AC XY: 184AN XY: 34526
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0157 AC: 2842AN: 181390Hom.: 104 AF XY: 0.0110 AC XY: 745AN XY: 67524
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00426 AC: 4677AN: 1097423Hom.: 142 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00362 AC XY: 1314AN XY: 363255
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00517 AC: 581AN: 112409Hom.: 12 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.00538 AC XY: 186AN XY: 34591
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 08, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 21, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 23, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Claritas Genomics | Mar 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 19, 2016 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 28, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Melnick-Needles syndrome;C0265293:Frontometaphyseal dysplasia;C1844696:Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type II;C1848213:Heterotopia, periventricular, X-linked dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at