rs2075038
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_005045.4(RELN):c.7530C>T(p.Pro2510=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.042 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,145 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.038 ( 158 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.042 ( 1987 hom. )
Consequence
RELN
NM_005045.4 synonymous
NM_005045.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.51
Genes affected
RELN (HGNC:9957): (reelin) This gene encodes a large secreted extracellular matrix protein thought to control cell-cell interactions critical for cell positioning and neuronal migration during brain development. This protein may be involved in schizophrenia, autism, bipolar disorder, major depression and in migration defects associated with temporal lobe epilepsy. Mutations of this gene are associated with autosomal recessive lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia. Two transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. Other transcript variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
?
Variant 7-103522160-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-103522160-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130141.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-103522160-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.51 with no splicing effect.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.14 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELN | NM_005045.4 | c.7530C>T | p.Pro2510= | synonymous_variant | 48/65 | ENST00000428762.6 | |
RELN | NM_173054.3 | c.7530C>T | p.Pro2510= | synonymous_variant | 48/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELN | ENST00000428762.6 | c.7530C>T | p.Pro2510= | synonymous_variant | 48/65 | 5 | NM_005045.4 | P5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0380 AC: 5770AN: 152008Hom.: 159 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
5770
AN:
152008
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0534 AC: 13431AN: 251446Hom.: 578 AF XY: 0.0576 AC XY: 7828AN XY: 135900
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
13431
AN:
251446
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
7828
AN XY:
135900
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0424 AC: 61968AN: 1461790Hom.: 1987 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0456 AC XY: 33130AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
61968
AN:
1461790
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
33130
AN XY:
727192
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0381 AC: 5791AN: 152126Hom.: 158 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0392 AC XY: 2917AN XY: 74374
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
5791
AN:
152126
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
2917
AN XY:
74374
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
339
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 31, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 25, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome;C4225327:Familial temporal lobe epilepsy 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at