rs2075784
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.62+15C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.516 in 1,472,344 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 201,346 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.44 ( 15762 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.53 ( 185584 hom. )
Consequence
POLE
NM_006231.4 intron
NM_006231.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.624
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 12-132687239-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132687239-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380208.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-132687239-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.535 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.62+15C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.62+15C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.437 AC: 66009AN: 150952Hom.: 15756 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
66009
AN:
150952
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.479 AC: 45218AN: 94332Hom.: 11313 AF XY: 0.486 AC XY: 25752AN XY: 53040
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
45218
AN:
94332
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25752
AN XY:
53040
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.525 AC: 694291AN: 1321288Hom.: 185584 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.523 AC XY: 341223AN XY: 652046
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
694291
AN:
1321288
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
341223
AN XY:
652046
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.437 AC: 66022AN: 151056Hom.: 15762 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.435 AC XY: 32081AN XY: 73780
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
66022
AN:
151056
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
32081
AN XY:
73780
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1398
AN:
3460
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 02, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 24, 2016 | Variant summary: The POLE c.62+15C>T intronic variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant along with 5/5 splice site tools predicitng the variant not to have an impact on splicing. This variant was found in 5171/10550 control chromosomes (1292 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.4901422, which greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLE variant (0.0000142), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 19, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Oct 25, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at