rs2115272

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):​c.684T>C​(p.Asn228Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.147 in 1,613,360 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24,105 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 6853 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 17252 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.866

Publications

26 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
SDHA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Illumina, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • neurodegeneration with ataxia and late-onset optic atrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Leigh syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leigh syndrome with leukodystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • mitochondrial complex II deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1GG
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 5-228247-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-228247-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130282.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.866 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.519 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004168.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SDHA
NM_004168.4
MANE Select
c.684T>Cp.Asn228Asn
synonymous
Exon 6 of 15NP_004159.2
SDHA
NM_001294332.2
c.540T>Cp.Asn180Asn
synonymous
Exon 5 of 14NP_001281261.1
SDHA
NM_001330758.2
c.684T>Cp.Asn228Asn
synonymous
Exon 6 of 13NP_001317687.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SDHA
ENST00000264932.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.684T>Cp.Asn228Asn
synonymous
Exon 6 of 15ENSP00000264932.6
ENSG00000286001
ENST00000651543.1
n.684T>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 6 of 24ENSP00000499215.1
SDHA
ENST00000510361.5
TSL:2
c.540T>Cp.Asn180Asn
synonymous
Exon 5 of 14ENSP00000427703.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.240
AC:
36476
AN:
151916
Hom.:
6826
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.524
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.306
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.220
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.165
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0561
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0887
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0819
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.206
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.125
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.232
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.152
AC:
38267
AN:
251138
AF XY:
0.143
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.545
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.190
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0608
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0862
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.150
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.137
AC:
199974
AN:
1461326
Hom.:
17252
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.134
AC XY:
97550
AN XY:
727006
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.542
AC:
18134
AN:
33458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.188
AC:
8428
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.165
AC:
4305
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0480
AC:
1907
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0901
AC:
7768
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0885
AC:
4730
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.138
AC:
798
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.130
AC:
144508
AN:
1111532
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.156
AC:
9396
AN:
60368
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8702
17404
26107
34809
43511
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5426
10852
16278
21704
27130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.240
AC:
36548
AN:
152034
Hom.:
6853
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.235
AC XY:
17437
AN XY:
74292
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.525
AC:
21731
AN:
41408
American (AMR)
AF:
0.220
AC:
3365
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.165
AC:
572
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0556
AC:
288
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0889
AC:
428
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0819
AC:
866
AN:
10580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.211
AC:
62
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.125
AC:
8475
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.229
AC:
482
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.513
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1187
2374
3560
4747
5934
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
326
652
978
1304
1630
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.179
Hom.:
1584
Bravo
AF:
0.267
Asia WGS
AF:
0.114
AC:
401
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.136
EpiControl
AF:
0.135

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Jan 03, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Dec 09, 2019
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Jan 08, 2025
Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BA1+BP6+BP7

Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5 Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 03, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing.

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndrome 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.091
DANN
Benign
0.26
PhyloP100
-0.87
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2115272; hg19: chr5-228362; COSMIC: COSV53765870; COSMIC: COSV53765870; API