rs213950

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 5P and 20B. PM1PM5PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):​c.1408G>A​(p.Val470Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.439 in 1,597,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 164,304 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V470G) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.56 ( 26569 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.43 ( 137735 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 missense

Scores

4
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.57

Publications

249 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
CFTR-AS1 (HGNC:40144): (CFTR antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 13 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 25 uncertain in NM_000492.4
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr7-117559480-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 3336635.Status of the report is no_assertion_criteria_provided, 0 stars.
PP2
Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 197 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 46 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: -3.1397 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: -1.0868 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to hereditary chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=9.284489E-7).
BP6
Variant 7-117559479-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117559479-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 7130.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.854 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CFTRNM_000492.4 linkc.1408G>A p.Val470Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000003084.11 NP_000483.3
CFTR-AS1NR_149084.1 linkn.221+1254C>T intron_variant Intron 2 of 2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CFTRENST00000003084.11 linkc.1408G>A p.Val470Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 NM_000492.4 ENSP00000003084.6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.557
AC:
84573
AN:
151846
Hom.:
26503
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.861
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.316
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.518
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.277
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.419
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.488
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.562
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.399
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.415
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.507
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.475
AC:
119239
AN:
251166
AF XY:
0.464
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.871
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.528
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.284
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.420
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.549
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.413
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.452
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.427
AC:
616894
AN:
1445762
Hom.:
137735
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.427
AC XY:
307171
AN XY:
720158
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.881
AC:
29129
AN:
33072
American (AMR)
AF:
0.521
AC:
23304
AN:
44696
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.283
AC:
7363
AN:
26044
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.406
AC:
16061
AN:
39550
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.475
AC:
40761
AN:
85900
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.547
AC:
29100
AN:
53222
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.387
AC:
2220
AN:
5736
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.403
AC:
442722
AN:
1097698
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.438
AC:
26234
AN:
59844
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15452
30904
46357
61809
77261
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
13758
27516
41274
55032
68790
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.557
AC:
84699
AN:
151964
Hom.:
26569
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.561
AC XY:
41636
AN XY:
74256
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.861
AC:
35759
AN:
41512
American (AMR)
AF:
0.518
AC:
7908
AN:
15252
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.277
AC:
962
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.419
AC:
2161
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.488
AC:
2352
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.562
AC:
5917
AN:
10526
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.378
AC:
111
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.415
AC:
28165
AN:
67914
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.510
AC:
1076
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1605
3210
4816
6421
8026
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
684
1368
2052
2736
3420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.444
Hom.:
71118
Bravo
AF:
0.564
TwinsUK
AF:
0.403
AC:
1493
ALSPAC
AF:
0.391
AC:
1507
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.850
AC:
3747
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.468
AC:
4026
ExAC
AF:
0.483
AC:
58619
Asia WGS
AF:
0.527
AC:
1834
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.394
EpiControl
AF:
0.390

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 27, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2008
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cystic fibrosis Benign:7
Mar 17, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 29, 2018
CFTR-France
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

the variant does not result in CFTR-RD neither -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 1990
OMIM
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Mar 01, 2023
Payam Genetics Center, General Welfare Department of North Khorasan Province
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 03, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CFTR-related disorder Benign:4
Mar 28, 2017
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nov 19, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Apr 03, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 30, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.049
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.030
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.72
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.53
D;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.64
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.43
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.39
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.68
T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
9.3e-7
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.14
N;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
2.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.60
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.48
N;.;.;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.46
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;.;.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;.;.;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.069
MPC
0.0040
ClinPred
0.0091
T
GERP RS
3.0
Varity_R
0.23
gMVP
0.80
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs213950; hg19: chr7-117199533; COSMIC: COSV50040905; COSMIC: COSV50040905; API