rs216868

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000552.5(VWF):​c.7082-7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.309 in 1,611,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81,704 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.27 ( 6372 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.31 ( 75332 hom. )

Consequence

VWF
NM_000552.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00009456
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.843

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VWF (HGNC:12726): (von Willebrand factor) This gene encodes a glycoprotein involved in hemostasis. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed following assembly into large multimeric complexes. These complexes function in the adhesion of platelets to sites of vascular injury and the transport of various proteins in the blood. Mutations in this gene result in von Willebrand disease, an inherited bleeding disorder. An unprocessed pseudogene has been found on chromosome 22. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
VWF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary von Willebrand disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • von Willebrand disease type 2B
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease 2
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • von Willebrand disease 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease type 2A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease type 2M
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease type 2N
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 12-5981998-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-5981998-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 256695.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.483 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
VWFNM_000552.5 linkc.7082-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 41 of 51 ENST00000261405.10 NP_000543.3 P04275-1
VWFXM_047429501.1 linkc.7082-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 41 of 51 XP_047285457.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VWFENST00000261405.10 linkc.7082-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 41 of 51 1 NM_000552.5 ENSP00000261405.5 P04275-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.272
AC:
41357
AN:
151840
Hom.:
6361
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.152
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.287
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.368
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.257
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.497
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.404
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.290
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.295
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.275
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.340
AC:
84017
AN:
247362
AF XY:
0.340
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.147
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.471
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.250
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.497
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.300
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.297
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.315
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.313
AC:
457049
AN:
1459938
Hom.:
75332
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.316
AC XY:
229178
AN XY:
726200
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.142
AC:
4749
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.458
AC:
20444
AN:
44672
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.240
AC:
6278
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.577
AC:
22909
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.412
AC:
35549
AN:
86196
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.306
AC:
16241
AN:
53070
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.268
AC:
1411
AN:
5256
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.298
AC:
331255
AN:
1111194
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.302
AC:
18213
AN:
60294
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15723
31447
47170
62894
78617
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11042
22084
33126
44168
55210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.272
AC:
41391
AN:
151958
Hom.:
6372
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.278
AC XY:
20671
AN XY:
74262
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.152
AC:
6315
AN:
41446
American (AMR)
AF:
0.369
AC:
5635
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.257
AC:
892
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.499
AC:
2564
AN:
5142
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.403
AC:
1942
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.290
AC:
3055
AN:
10542
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.214
AC:
63
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.295
AC:
20072
AN:
67934
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.280
AC:
591
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1436
2873
4309
5746
7182
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
448
896
1344
1792
2240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.287
Hom.:
2939
Bravo
AF:
0.271
Asia WGS
AF:
0.426
AC:
1482
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.287
EpiControl
AF:
0.294

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

von Willebrand disease type 2 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

von Willebrand disease type 3 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

von Willebrand disease type 1 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary von Willebrand disease Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
6.8
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
0.84
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000095
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs216868; hg19: chr12-6091164; COSMIC: COSV54639815; API