Menu
GeneBe

rs2227971

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.2222C>T(p.Ala741Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000214 in 1,614,234 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

5
11
3

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, PTCH1
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01829794).
BP6
Variant 9-95468779-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95468779-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135095.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-95468779-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000269 (41/152346) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00694 (36/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00515. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 22 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 41 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2222C>T p.Ala741Val missense_variant 14/24 ENST00000331920.11
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2219C>T p.Ala740Val missense_variant 14/24 ENST00000437951.6
LOC100507346NR_038982.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.717G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.2222C>T p.Ala741Val missense_variant 14/245 NM_000264.5 A2Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2219C>T p.Ala740Val missense_variant 14/245 NM_001083603.3 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000269
AC:
41
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00692
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000700
AC:
176
AN:
251496
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000640
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00913
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000439
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000209
AC:
305
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000199
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00589
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000719
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000960
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000269
AC:
41
AN:
152346
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000295
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00694
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000531
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000329
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000642
AC:
78
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gorlin syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental UniversitySep 28, 2015- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 07, 2022- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
not specified Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 28, 2021- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 13, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 21, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 31, 2020- -
Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.46
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.094
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.37
Cadd
Pathogenic
27
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.76
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.65
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;.;D;D;.;.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.27
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.50
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.75
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.82
Sift
Benign
0.063
T;D;D;D;D;D;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.79
P;P;P;P;P;P;P
Vest4
0.93
MVP
0.85
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.096
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.56
gMVP
0.80

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2227971; hg19: chr9-98231061; API