rs2228042
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_007110.5(TEP1):c.6129G>T(p.Thr2043Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007110.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_007110.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEP1 | NM_007110.5 | MANE Select | c.6129G>T | p.Thr2043Thr | synonymous | Exon 42 of 55 | NP_009041.2 | ||
| TEP1 | NM_001319035.2 | c.5805G>T | p.Thr1935Thr | synonymous | Exon 40 of 53 | NP_001305964.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEP1 | ENST00000262715.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.6129G>T | p.Thr2043Thr | synonymous | Exon 42 of 55 | ENSP00000262715.5 | ||
| TEP1 | ENST00000556935.5 | TSL:1 | c.5805G>T | p.Thr1935Thr | synonymous | Exon 40 of 53 | ENSP00000452574.1 | ||
| TEP1 | ENST00000555008.5 | TSL:1 | n.4158G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 30 of 43 | ENSP00000450541.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461868Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at