rs2228137
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001220500.2(FCER2):c.184C>T(p.Arg62Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.149 in 1,608,806 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20,203 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R62Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001220500.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCER2 | NM_001220500.2 | c.184C>T | p.Arg62Trp | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 11 | ENST00000597921.6 | NP_001207429.1 | |
| FCER2 | NM_002002.5 | c.184C>T | p.Arg62Trp | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 11 | NP_001993.2 | ||
| FCER2 | NM_001207019.3 | c.181C>T | p.Arg61Trp | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 10 | NP_001193948.2 | ||
| FCER2 | XM_005272462.5 | c.184C>T | p.Arg62Trp | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 11 | XP_005272519.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.184 AC: 27945AN: 151854Hom.: 3145 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.152 AC: 37873AN: 249346 AF XY: 0.156 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.145 AC: 211144AN: 1456834Hom.: 17054 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.148 AC XY: 107160AN XY: 724732 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.184 AC: 27984AN: 151972Hom.: 3149 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.183 AC XY: 13605AN XY: 74282 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at